Skip to content
GitLab
Menu
Projects
Groups
Snippets
/
Help
Help
Support
Community forum
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Submit feedback
Contribute to GitLab
Sign in
Toggle navigation
Menu
Open sidebar
ZerXes
Tor
Commits
322eddb0
Commit
322eddb0
authored
Oct 18, 2007
by
Roger Dingledine
Browse files
changelog entry for r11985 (bug 529)
svn:r12034
parent
5bfb4221
Changes
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
ChangeLog
View file @
322eddb0
...
...
@@ -10,6 +10,12 @@ Changes in version 0.2.0.9-alpha - 2007-10-??
when we find our DirPort to be reachable but won't actually publish
it. Extra descriptors without any real changes are dropped by the
authorities, and can screw up our "publish every 18 hours" schedule.
- When a router wasn't listed in a new networkstatus, we were leaving
the flags for that router alone -- meaning it remained Named,
Running, etc -- even though absence from the networkstatus means
that it shouldn't be considered to exist at all anymore. Now we
clear all the flags for routers that fall out of the networkstatus
consensus. Fixes bug 529.
o Minor features (router descriptor cache):
- If we find a cached-routers file that's been sitting around for more
...
...
@@ -76,6 +82,7 @@ Changes in version 0.2.0.9-alpha - 2007-10-??
Unix users an easy way to script their Tor process (e.g. by adjusting
bandwidth based on the time of the day).
Changes in version 0.2.0.8-alpha - 2007-10-12
o Major features (router descriptor cache):
- Store routers in a file called cached-descriptors instead of in
...
...
@@ -2450,7 +2457,7 @@ Changes in version 0.1.1.13-alpha - 2006-02-09
addresses, unless the server operator explicitly turns it off.
o Major features:
- Clients no
t
longer download descriptors for non-running
- Clients no longer download descriptors for non-running
descriptors.
- Before we add new directory authorities, we should make it
clear that only v1 authorities should receive/publish hidden
...
...
Write
Preview
Supports
Markdown
0%
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Attach a file
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment