Loading doc/spec/proposals/122-unnamed-flag.txt +9 −2 Original line number Diff line number Diff line Loading @@ -43,8 +43,10 @@ Status: Open 2. The stopgap solution: tor26 should start accepting and listing the imposters, but it should assign them a new flag: "Unnamed". This would produce three cases in terms of assigning flags: assign them a new flag: "Unnamed". This would produce three cases in terms of assigning flags in the consensus networkstatus: i) a router gets the Named flag in the v3 networkstatus if a) it's the only router with that nickname that has the Named flag Loading Loading @@ -98,6 +100,11 @@ Status: Open entire period. We could solve this by making the voting more complex, but that doesn't seem worth it. [3.3. Tor26 is only one tor26. We need more naming authorities, possibly with some kind of auto-naming feature. This is out-of-scope for this proposal -NM] 4. Other benefits: This new flag will allow people to operate servers that happen to have Loading Loading
doc/spec/proposals/122-unnamed-flag.txt +9 −2 Original line number Diff line number Diff line Loading @@ -43,8 +43,10 @@ Status: Open 2. The stopgap solution: tor26 should start accepting and listing the imposters, but it should assign them a new flag: "Unnamed". This would produce three cases in terms of assigning flags: assign them a new flag: "Unnamed". This would produce three cases in terms of assigning flags in the consensus networkstatus: i) a router gets the Named flag in the v3 networkstatus if a) it's the only router with that nickname that has the Named flag Loading Loading @@ -98,6 +100,11 @@ Status: Open entire period. We could solve this by making the voting more complex, but that doesn't seem worth it. [3.3. Tor26 is only one tor26. We need more naming authorities, possibly with some kind of auto-naming feature. This is out-of-scope for this proposal -NM] 4. Other benefits: This new flag will allow people to operate servers that happen to have Loading
