Commit 3c459a73 authored by Nick Mathewson's avatar Nick Mathewson 🏃
Browse files

r9077@totoro: nickm | 2006-10-18 11:41:16 -0400

 Another patch from Mike Perry; sprintfing a NULL pointer. (with comment).

parent 0c2109dd
......@@ -384,7 +384,16 @@ command_process_destroy_cell(cell_t *cell, or_connection_t *conn)
/* XXXX This logic is wrong. Really, we should report the fact that
* the circuit was closed because of a DESTROY, *and* we should report
* the reason that we were given. -NM */
* the reason that we were given. -NM
* Hrmm. We could store the fact that we sent a truncate and the
* reason for this truncate in circuit_t. If we ever get a destroy
* that doesn't match this reason, we could complain loudly -MP
* That won't work for the cases where the destroy is not because of
* a truncate, though. The idea is that if we get a DESTROYED cell
* with reason 'CONNECTFAILED' and another DESTROYED cell with reason
* 'RESOURCELIMIT', the controller may want to know the reported
* reason. -NM
circuit_mark_for_close(circ, reason);
......@@ -2837,7 +2837,7 @@ circuit_end_reason_to_string(int reason)
log_warn(LD_BUG, "Unrecognized reason code %d", (int)reason);
return NULL;
return "REASON=UNRECOGNIZED"; /* should never get called */
Supports Markdown
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment