Loading src/or/circuitbuild.c +12 −6 Changes for src/or/circuitbuild.c: 12 added lines, 6 removed lines. Original line number Diff line number Diff line Loading @@ -2896,7 +2896,7 @@ warn_if_last_router_excluded(origin_circuit_t *circ, const extend_info_t *exit) case CIRCUIT_PURPOSE_C_GENERAL: if (circ->build_state->is_internal) return; description = "Requested exit node"; description = "requested exit node"; rs = options->_ExcludeExitNodesUnion; break; case CIRCUIT_PURPOSE_C_INTRODUCING: Loading @@ -2911,22 +2911,28 @@ warn_if_last_router_excluded(origin_circuit_t *circ, const extend_info_t *exit) case CIRCUIT_PURPOSE_C_REND_READY: case CIRCUIT_PURPOSE_C_REND_READY_INTRO_ACKED: case CIRCUIT_PURPOSE_C_REND_JOINED: description = "Chosen rendezvous point"; description = "chosen rendezvous point"; domain = LD_BUG; break; case CIRCUIT_PURPOSE_CONTROLLER: rs = options->_ExcludeExitNodesUnion; description = "Controller-selected circuit target"; description = "controller-selected circuit target"; break; } if (routerset_contains_extendinfo(rs, exit)) { log_fn(LOG_WARN, domain, "%s '%s' is in ExcludeNodes%s. Using anyway " "(circuit purpose %d).", /* We should never get here if StrictNodes is set to 1. */ if (options->StrictNodes) log_warn(LD_BUG, "Using an excluded node with StrictNodes set. " "Please report the following log message to the " "developers."); log_fn(LOG_WARN, domain, "Using %s '%s' which is listed in " "ExcludeNodes%s, because no other options were available. To " "prevent this, set the StrictNodes configuration option." "(Circuit purpose is %d)", description,exit->nickname, rs==options->ExcludeNodes?"":" or ExcludeExitNodes", (int)purpose); /* XXX022-1090 "using anyway" is freaking people out -RD */ circuit_log_path(LOG_WARN, domain, circ); } Loading Loading
src/or/circuitbuild.c +12 −6 Changes for src/or/circuitbuild.c: 12 added lines, 6 removed lines. Original line number Diff line number Diff line Loading @@ -2896,7 +2896,7 @@ warn_if_last_router_excluded(origin_circuit_t *circ, const extend_info_t *exit) case CIRCUIT_PURPOSE_C_GENERAL: if (circ->build_state->is_internal) return; description = "Requested exit node"; description = "requested exit node"; rs = options->_ExcludeExitNodesUnion; break; case CIRCUIT_PURPOSE_C_INTRODUCING: Loading @@ -2911,22 +2911,28 @@ warn_if_last_router_excluded(origin_circuit_t *circ, const extend_info_t *exit) case CIRCUIT_PURPOSE_C_REND_READY: case CIRCUIT_PURPOSE_C_REND_READY_INTRO_ACKED: case CIRCUIT_PURPOSE_C_REND_JOINED: description = "Chosen rendezvous point"; description = "chosen rendezvous point"; domain = LD_BUG; break; case CIRCUIT_PURPOSE_CONTROLLER: rs = options->_ExcludeExitNodesUnion; description = "Controller-selected circuit target"; description = "controller-selected circuit target"; break; } if (routerset_contains_extendinfo(rs, exit)) { log_fn(LOG_WARN, domain, "%s '%s' is in ExcludeNodes%s. Using anyway " "(circuit purpose %d).", /* We should never get here if StrictNodes is set to 1. */ if (options->StrictNodes) log_warn(LD_BUG, "Using an excluded node with StrictNodes set. " "Please report the following log message to the " "developers."); log_fn(LOG_WARN, domain, "Using %s '%s' which is listed in " "ExcludeNodes%s, because no other options were available. To " "prevent this, set the StrictNodes configuration option." "(Circuit purpose is %d)", description,exit->nickname, rs==options->ExcludeNodes?"":" or ExcludeExitNodes", (int)purpose); /* XXX022-1090 "using anyway" is freaking people out -RD */ circuit_log_path(LOG_WARN, domain, circ); } Loading