Skip to content

GitLab

  • Menu
Projects Groups Snippets
    • Loading...
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Sign in
  • Trac Trac
  • Project information
    • Project information
    • Activity
    • Labels
    • Members
  • Issues 246
    • Issues 246
    • List
    • Boards
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
  • Monitor
    • Monitor
    • Metrics
    • Incidents
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • Value stream
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Activity
  • Create a new issue
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar
  • Legacy
  • TracTrac
  • Issues
  • #10194

Closed (moved)
(moved)
Open
Created Nov 19, 2013 by Matthew Finkel@sysrqb

Allow for preferential bridge assignment to buckets

After #9652 (moved) is fixed, we should also provide a way to specify which transports a bucket prefers.

Something along the line of:

FILE_BUCKETS = { "name1": {"size": 10, "pt": ["obfs2", "obfs3"]},
                 "name2": {"size": 15},
                 "foobar": {"size": 3, "pt": ["obfs3"]}}

Which will result in the "name1" bucket containing 10 bridges, where most will support obfs2 and/or obfs3. "name2" bucket will contain 15 bridges, but has no preference for pluggable transports, and "foobar" will contain 3 bridges where most will be obfs3 bridges.

To upload designs, you'll need to enable LFS and have an admin enable hashed storage. More information
Assignee
Assign to
Time tracking