Skip to content

GitLab

  • Projects
  • Groups
  • Snippets
  • Help
    • Loading...
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Sign in
Trac
Trac
  • Project overview
    • Project overview
    • Details
    • Activity
  • Issues 246
    • Issues 246
    • List
    • Boards
    • Labels
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
  • Operations
    • Operations
    • Metrics
    • Incidents
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • Value Stream
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Members
    • Members
  • Activity
  • Create a new issue
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar

GitLab is used only for code review, issue tracking and project management. Canonical locations for source code are still https://gitweb.torproject.org/ https://git.torproject.org/ and git-rw.torproject.org.

  • Legacy
  • TracTrac
  • Issues
  • #14709

Closed (moved)
Open
Opened Feb 03, 2015 by Andrea Shepard@andrea

Should the hash tables in circuitmux_t have channel ID in them?

(per discussion with nickm and skruffy in #tor-dev on 2015-02-02)

Arguably using (channel_id, circuit_id) pairs rather than bare circuit IDs in the hash table in a circuitmux (circuitmux_t.chanid_circid_map) is generality we never actually used and we should consider whether we can eliminate it and save memory.

To upload designs, you'll need to enable LFS and have an admin enable hashed storage. More information
Assignee
Assign to
Tor: unspecified
Milestone
Tor: unspecified
Assign milestone
Time tracking
None
Due date
None
Reference: legacy/trac#14709