Skip to content

GitLab

  • Projects
  • Groups
  • Snippets
  • Help
    • Loading...
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Sign in
Trac
Trac
  • Project overview
    • Project overview
    • Details
    • Activity
  • Issues 246
    • Issues 246
    • List
    • Boards
    • Labels
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
  • Operations
    • Operations
    • Metrics
    • Incidents
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • Value Stream
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Members
    • Members
  • Collapse sidebar
  • Activity
  • Create a new issue
  • Issue Boards

GitLab is used only for code review, issue tracking and project management. Canonical locations for source code are still https://gitweb.torproject.org/ https://git.torproject.org/ and git-rw.torproject.org.

  • Legacy
  • TracTrac
  • Issues
  • #17270

Closed (moved)
Open
Opened Oct 07, 2015 by Nick Mathewson@nickm🤠

Evaluate non-C tor implementations for hackability

For testing, we should have badly-behaved clients and servers. But implementing that in C seems like horrible overkill. Let's look at the best-of-breed compatible implementations, and figure out which one would be the best basis for making a bunch of stub test client/servers.

(It's okay if the client answer and the server answer aren't the same)

To upload designs, you'll need to enable LFS and have an admin enable hashed storage. More information
Assignee
Assign to
Tor: 0.2.8.x-final
Milestone
Tor: 0.2.8.x-final
Assign milestone
Time tracking
None
Due date
None
Reference: legacy/trac#17270