Skip to content

GitLab

  • Menu
Projects Groups Snippets
    • Loading...
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Sign in
  • Trac Trac
  • Project information
    • Project information
    • Activity
    • Labels
    • Members
  • Issues 246
    • Issues 246
    • List
    • Boards
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
  • Monitor
    • Monitor
    • Metrics
    • Incidents
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • Value stream
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Activity
  • Create a new issue
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar
  • Legacy
  • TracTrac
  • Issues
  • #20966

Closed (moved)
(moved)
Open
Created Dec 14, 2016 by Roger Dingledine@arma

Parts of deployed shared random protocol are specified only in the proposal

In dir-spec.txt, commit c4ae4dd31 gave us lines like

+        Denotes a directory authority commit for the shared randomness
+        protocol, containing the commitment value and potentially also the
+        reveal value. See sections [COMMITREVEAL] and [VALIDATEVALUES] of
+        proposal 250 on how to generate and validate these values.

That's a great improvement over just leaving it implicit. But if we have a goal of having Tor specified in the spec files (is that true?), then we should migrate the key sections from the proposal file to either dir-spec or a new srv-spec file.

To upload designs, you'll need to enable LFS and have an admin enable hashed storage. More information
Assignee
Assign to
Time tracking