Ticket #16706 (moved) is one of the possible many issues we had and will have with this function.
It is quite big with many many return callsite and it is confusing on how it behaves. For instance, if
-reason is returned, the caller should teardown the circuit and log warn but yet this functions already does many
LOG_PROTOCOL_WARN in that case.
One thing we could do is maybe return a different error code (or set an error code) depending on what's happening (should close circ, cell dropped, error). For instance, currently, returning 0 can either mean that a cell was dropped or successfully relayed.
Auditing every callsite of this function would be important to understand how it is actually used so we can properly improve it and make it less error prone with dubious logging (or improved logging).