did #18342 break RS' display of the host_name field?

https://onionoo.torproject.org/details?limit=4&fields=host_name&fingerprint=4B5EEA88318698885B586286270449469949D514

{"version":"6.1",
"build_revision":"eee9cf8",
"relays_published":"2018-07-18 20:00:00",
"relays":[
{"host_name":"80.82.70.116"}
],
"bridges_published":"2018-07-18 19:51:43",
"bridges":[
]}

RS says: Host Name: None

Maybe it is just no longer aiming at displaying host_name field data but one of the new fields?

refs #26834 (moved) #18342 (moved)

btw: does this make any sense: "host_name":"89.245.126.97","verified_host_names":["i59F57E61.versanet.de"]

shouldn't host_name match the content of verified_host_names when that is present?