Skip to content

GitLab

  • Menu
Projects Groups Snippets
    • Loading...
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Sign in
  • Trac Trac
  • Project information
    • Project information
    • Activity
    • Labels
    • Members
  • Issues 246
    • Issues 246
    • List
    • Boards
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
  • Monitor
    • Monitor
    • Metrics
    • Incidents
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • Value stream
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Activity
  • Create a new issue
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar
  • Legacy
  • TracTrac
  • Issues
  • #31435

Closed (moved)
(moved)
Open
Created Aug 17, 2019 by Iain Learmonth@irl

Emulate different Fast/Guard cutoffs in historical consensuses

There are many things that we can tune in producing votes and consensuses that will affect the ways that clients use the network, that might result in better load balancing.

We need tools for simulating what happens when we make those changes, using data (either historical or live) for the public Tor network.

We can consider the MVP for this complete once we have a tool that allows us to take server descriptors and simulate votes and consensus generation using alternate Fast/Guard cutoffs.

Extensions to this would be allowing alternative consensus methods, or other tunables.

By reducing the cost of performing these simulations we can allow faster iteration on ideas that will hopefully allow for better user experience.

To upload designs, you'll need to enable LFS and have an admin enable hashed storage. More information
Assignee
Assign to
Time tracking