Commit 8335b1f9 authored by Nick Mathewson's avatar Nick Mathewson 🦀
Browse files

Merge branch 'maint-0.2.6' into maint-0.2.7

parents 83dfcfbc db815653
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading

changes/bug18089

0 → 100644
+6 −0
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
  o Minor fixes (security):
    - Make memwipe() do nothing when passed a NULL pointer
      or zero size. Check size argument to memwipe() for underflow.
      Closes bug #18089. Reported by "gk", patch by "teor".
      Bugfix on 0.2.3.25 and 0.2.4.6-alpha (#7352),
      commit 49dd5ef3 on 7 Nov 2012.
+8 −0
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -2556,6 +2556,7 @@ smartlist_shuffle(smartlist_t *sl)
/**
 * Destroy the <b>sz</b> bytes of data stored at <b>mem</b>, setting them to
 * the value <b>byte</b>.
 * If <b>mem</b> is NULL or <b>sz</b> is zero, nothing happens.
 *
 * This function is preferable to memset, since many compilers will happily
 * optimize out memset() when they can convince themselves that the data being
@@ -2573,6 +2574,13 @@ smartlist_shuffle(smartlist_t *sl)
void
memwipe(void *mem, uint8_t byte, size_t sz)
{
  if (mem == NULL || sz == 0) {
    return;
  }

  /* Data this large is likely to be an underflow. */
  tor_assert(sz < SIZE_T_CEILING);

  /* Because whole-program-optimization exists, we may not be able to just
   * have this function call "memset".  A smart compiler could inline it, then
   * eliminate dead memsets, and declare itself to be clever. */