changes/bug7352
0 → 100644
+12
−0
+2
−2
+1
−1
+66
−23
+3
−0
Loading
Apparently some compilers like to eliminate memset() operations on data that's about to go out-of-scope. I've gone with the safest possible replacement, which might be a bit slow. I don't think this is critical path in any way that will affect performance, but if it is, we can work on that in 0.2.4. Fixes bug 7352.