From a339449a41fb4d05f9c996df457ba03093d43502 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Roger Dingledine <arma@torproject.org>
Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2006 06:30:48 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] a new research problem our weight_for_exit algorithm has
introduced.
svn:r8631
---
doc/TODO | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/doc/TODO b/doc/TODO
index 29d0aef425..212775802f 100644
--- a/doc/TODO
+++ b/doc/TODO
@@ -76,6 +76,12 @@ P - Figure out why dll's compiled in mingw don't work right in Winxp.
P - Figure out why openssl 0.9.8c "make test" fails at sha256t test.
Items for 0.1.2.x:
+ - Now that we're avoiding exits when picking non-exit positions,
+ we need to consider how to pick nodes for internal circuits. If
+ we avoid exits for all positions, we skew the load balancig. If
+ we accept exits for all positions, we leak whether it's an internal
+ circuit at every step. If we accept exits only at the last hop, we
+ reintroduce Lasse's attacks from the Oakland paper.
o re-enable blossom functionality: let tor servers decide if they
will use local search when resolving, or not.
o Document it.
--
GitLab