Redefine restricted NAT designation to include only symmetric NATs
See https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/anti-censorship/pluggable-transports/snowflake/-/wikis/NAT-matching for an overview of NAT types and compatibility.
Right now we classify a client NAT as "restricted" if it is symmetrically NAT'd (i.e., has an (AO,X) or (AP,X) NAT mapping and filtering behaviour) and also if it has an aggressive filter (AI, AP).
As mentioned as a footnote on the NAT matching wiki page, most (AI,AP) clients will actually work with most (> 80% of) restricted proxies. It's also the case, judging by recent snowflake CollecTor stats, that the majority of clients are (AI,AP). Right now these clients are drawing from the very small unrestricted proxies bucket and depleting this resource. I'd like to reclassify these clients as unrestricted so they can pull from the restricted proxy pool. Getting a failed proxy ~20% of the time shouldn't be an issue, especially with the future plans to multiplex in #25723.
This also means that "restricted" is defined differently for clients vs. proxies. (AI,AP) is a restricted proxy, but an unrestricted client.
To do this, I'd like to make the following changes:
Have standalone proxies do the probe test instead of using the RFC 5780 method to determine NAT behaviour
Redefine (AI,AP) to be an unrestricted NAT type