Commit 18237807 authored by mozilla%colinogilvie.co.uk's avatar mozilla%colinogilvie.co.uk
Browse files

Bug 361251: update Bugzilla FAQ

Patch by victory(_RSZ_) <bmo2007@rsz.jp>; r=LpSolit; r=Colin
parent 5ead2cce
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+138 −44
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -13,6 +13,21 @@
    <qandadiv id="faq-general">
      <title>General Questions</title>

      <qandaentry>
        <question id="faq-general-tryout">
          <para>
            Can I try out Bugzilla somewhere?
          </para>
        </question>
        <answer>
          <para>
            If you want to take a test ride, there are test installations
            at <ulink url="http://landfill.bugzilla.org/"/>,
            ready to play with directly from your browser.
          </para>
        </answer>
      </qandaentry>

      <qandaentry>
        <question id="faq-general-license">
          <para>
@@ -126,7 +141,7 @@
          </para>
          <para>
            The best way to make an enhancement request is to <ulink 
            url="http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla">file
            url="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla">file
            a bug at bugzilla.mozilla.org</ulink> and set the Severity
            to 'enhancement'. Your 'request for enhancement' (RFE) will
            start out in the UNCONFIRMED state, and will stay there until
@@ -169,35 +184,44 @@
            and was available for the hardware Netscape intended to run it on.
          </para>
          <para>
            There is currently work in progress to make Bugzilla work on
            PostgreSQL; track the progress of this initiative in <ulink
            url="http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98304">bug 98304</ulink>.
          </para>
          <para>
            Sybase support is no longer being worked on.  Even if it eventually
            happens, it's VERY unlikely to work without the end-user-company
            having to stick a few developers on making several manual changes.
            Sybase is just NOT very standards-compliant (despite all the hype),
            and it turned out that way too much had to be changed to make it
            work -- like moving half of the application logic into stored
            procedures to get any kind of decent performance out of it.
            <ulink url="http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=173130">Bug
            173130</ulink> is the relevant bug.
            Bugzilla 2.20 contains experimental support for PostgreSQL.
            Bugzilla 2.22 contains complete, stable support for PostgreSQL.
            As of this release, using PostgreSQL with Bugzilla should
            be as stable as using MySQL. If you experience any problems
            with PostgreSQL compatibility, they will be taken as
            seriously as if you were running MySQL.
          </para>
          <para>
            Red Hat once ran a version of Bugzilla that worked on Oracle, 
            but that was long, long ago; that version (Bugzilla 2.8) is
            now obsolete, insecure, and totally unsupported. Red Hat's
            current Bugzilla (based on Bugzilla 2.17.1) uses PostgreSQL,
            and work is being done to merge those changes into the main
            distribution. (See above.) At this time we know of no recent
            ports of Bugzilla to Oracle. (In our honest opinion, Bugzilla
            doesn't need what Oracle offers.)
            now obsolete, insecure, and totally unsupported.
          </para>
          <para>
            <ulink url="http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=237862">Bug
            237862</ulink> is a good bug to read through if you'd like to see
            what progress is being made on general database compatibility.
            In August of 2005, Wim Coekaerts (Director of Linux
            Engineering at Oracle Corporation) wrote to Dave Miller
            confirming that Oracle intends to implement and support
            Bugzilla. Since then, no further information has been
            forthcoming. Track progress at
            <ulink url="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189947">
            Bug 189947</ulink>.
          </para>
          <para>
            Sybase support is no longer being worked on. Even if it
            eventually happens, it's VERY unlikely to work without
            the end-user-company having to stick a few developers on
            making several manual changes. Sybase is just NOT very
            standards-compliant (despite all the hype), and it turned
            out that way too much had to be changed to make it work --
            like moving half of the application logic into stored
            procedures to get any kind of decent performance out of it.
            <ulink url="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=173130">
            Bug 173130</ulink> is the relevant bug.
          </para>
          <para>
            <ulink url="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=237862">
            Bug 237862</ulink> is a good bug to read through if you'd
            like to see what progress is being made on general database
            compatibility.
          </para>
        </answer>
      </qandaentry>
@@ -319,6 +343,21 @@ perl runtests.pl 2 --verbose
        </answer>
      </qandaentry>

      <qandaentry>
        <question id="faq-general-selinux">
          <para>
            How can Bugzilla be made to work under SELinux?
          </para>
        </question>
        <answer>
          <para>
            Unfortunately there are no step-by-step instructions,
            but the following URL contains hints on how to do it:
            <ulink url="http://fedora.redhat.com/docs/selinux-apache-fc3/sn-debugging-and-customizing.html" />
          </para>
        </answer>
      </qandaentry>

    </qandadiv>

    <qandadiv id="faq-phb">
@@ -355,7 +394,7 @@ perl runtests.pl 2 --verbose
          <para>
            There is no GUI for adding fields to Bugzilla at this
            time. You can follow development of this feature in 
            <ulink url="http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91037">bug 91037</ulink>
            <ulink url="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91037">bug 91037</ulink>
          </para>
        </answer>
      </qandaentry>
@@ -369,7 +408,7 @@ perl runtests.pl 2 --verbose
        </question>
        <answer>
          <para>
            Yes. Look at <ulink url="http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/report.cgi"/>
            Yes. Look at <ulink url="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/report.cgi"/>
            for samples of what Bugzilla can do in reporting and graphing.
            Fuller documentation is provided in <xref linkend="reporting"/>.
          </para>
@@ -481,7 +520,7 @@ perl runtests.pl 2 --verbose
            Some admin interfaces have been templatized (for easy localization)
            but many of them are still available in English only. Also, there
            may be issues with the charset not being declared. See <ulink
            url="http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126266">bug 126226</ulink>
            url="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126266">bug 126226</ulink>
            for more information.
          </para>
        </answer>
@@ -952,7 +991,7 @@ password=mypassword
            For older versions of Bugzilla, you may be able to apply 
            Klaas Freitag's patch for <quote>whineatassigned</quote>,
            which can be found in
            <ulink url="http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6679">bug
            <ulink url="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6679">bug
            6679</ulink>. Note that this patch was made in 2000, so it may take
            some work to apply cleanly to any releases of Bugzilla newer than
            that, but you can use it as a starting point.
@@ -961,7 +1000,7 @@ password=mypassword
          <para>
            An updated (and much-expanded) version of this functionality is
            due to be released as part of Bugzilla 2.20; see 
            <ulink url="http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=185090">bug
            <ulink url="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=185090">bug
            185090</ulink> for the discussion, and for more up-to-date patches
            if you just can't wait.
          </para>
@@ -1124,6 +1163,61 @@ password=mypassword
              as a troubleshooting step.
            </para>
          </warning>
          <para>
            You may also be suffering from a client version mismatch:
          </para>
          <para>
            MySQL 4.1 and up uses an authentication protocol based on
            a password hashing algorithm that is incompatible with that
            used by older clients. If you upgrade the server to 4.1,
            attempts to connect to it with an older client may fail
            with the following message:
          </para>
          <para>
            <screen><prompt>shell&gt;</prompt> mysql
            Client does not support authentication protocol requested
            by server; consider upgrading MySQL client
            </screen>
          </para>
          <para>
            To solve this problem, you should use one of the following
            approaches:
          </para>
          <para>
            <itemizedlist>
              <listitem>
                <para>
                  Upgrade all client programs to use a 4.1.1 or newer
                  client library.
                </para>
              </listitem>
              <listitem>
                <para>
                  When connecting to the server with a pre-4.1 client
                  program, use an account that still has a
                  pre-4.1-style password.
                </para>
              </listitem>
              <listitem>
                <para>
                  Reset the password to pre-4.1 style for each user
                  that needs to use a pre-4.1 client program.
                  This can be done using the SET PASSWORD statement
                  and the OLD_PASSWORD() function:
                  <screen>
                    <prompt>mysql&gt;</prompt> SET PASSWORD FOR
                    <prompt>    -&gt;</prompt> ' some_user '@' some_host ' = OLD_PASSWORD(' newpwd ');
                  </screen>
                </para>
              </listitem>
            </itemizedlist>
            
          </para>


          <para>
          </para>

        </answer>
      </qandaentry>

@@ -1358,16 +1452,16 @@ password=mypassword
            have your choice of patches: 
            <simplelist>
              <member>
                <ulink url="http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35195">Bug 35195</ulink>
                <ulink url="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35195">Bug 35195</ulink>
                seeks to add an <quote>...and accept the bug</quote> checkbox
                to the UI. It has two patches attached to it: 
                <ulink url="http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/showattachment.cgi?attach_id=8029">attachment 8029</ulink>
                <ulink url="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/showattachment.cgi?attach_id=8029">attachment 8029</ulink>
                was originally created for Bugzilla 2.12, while 
                <ulink url="http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/showattachment.cgi?attach_id=91372">attachment 91372</ulink>
                <ulink url="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/showattachment.cgi?attach_id=91372">attachment 91372</ulink>
                is an updated version for Bugzilla 2.16
              </member>
              <member>
                <ulink url="http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37613">Bug
                <ulink url="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37613">Bug
                37613</ulink> also provides two patches (against Bugzilla
                2.12): one to add a 'Take Bug' option, and the other to
                automatically reassign the bug on 'Accept'. 
@@ -1501,13 +1595,13 @@ password=mypassword
        </question>
        <answer>
          <para>
            Try <ulink url="http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&amp;bug_status=ASSIGNED&amp;bug_status=REOPENED&amp;product=Bugzilla">
            Try <ulink url="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&amp;bug_status=ASSIGNED&amp;bug_status=REOPENED&amp;product=Bugzilla">
            this link</ulink> to view current bugs or requests for
            enhancement for Bugzilla.
          </para>
          <para>
            You can view bugs marked for &bz-nextver; release
            <ulink url="http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?product=Bugzilla&amp;target_milestone=Bugzilla+&amp;bz-nextver;">here</ulink>.
            <ulink url="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?product=Bugzilla&amp;target_milestone=Bugzilla+&amp;bz-nextver;">here</ulink>.
            This list includes bugs for the &bz-nextver; release that have already
            been fixed and checked into CVS. Please consult the
            <ulink url="http://www.bugzilla.org/">
@@ -1529,7 +1623,7 @@ password=mypassword
        <answer>
          <para>
            This is well-documented in <ulink
            url="http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49862">bug
            url="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49862">bug
            49862</ulink>. Ultimately, it's as easy as adding the
            <quote>---</quote> priority field to your localconfig file
            in the appropriate area, re-running checksetup.pl, and then
@@ -1552,7 +1646,7 @@ password=mypassword
              <listitem>
                <para>
                  Enter a bug into bugzilla.mozilla.org for the <quote><ulink
                  url="http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla">Bugzilla</ulink></quote>
                  url="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla">Bugzilla</ulink></quote>
                  product.
                </para>
              </listitem>
@@ -1571,7 +1665,7 @@ password=mypassword
              <listitem>
                <para>
                  Announce your patch and the associated URL
                  (http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=XXXXXX)
                  (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=XXXXXX)
                  for discussion in the newsgroup
                  (mozilla.support.bugzilla). You'll get a
                  really good, fairly immediate reaction to the