Commit 90d0f4f4 authored by Matthew Gaudet's avatar Matthew Gaudet
Browse files

Bug 1784181 - Add Reflect.parse tests to the JS Feature Checklist r=dminor DONTBUILD

parent 5fa498fd
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+9 −3
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -45,6 +45,13 @@ _Sometimes Complexity of the web-platform leaks into JS Feature works_
  option set than main thread, and it's easy to forget them!) You may want to
  write a mochitest. 

### Syntax Features Checklist

-  ☐ Does `Reflect.parse` correctly parse and return results for your new syntax?
  - `Reflect.parse` tests are interesting as well, because they can be written
    for new syntax before bytecode emission is done.
  -  ☐ Are the locations correct for the new syntax entries in the parse tree?
-  ☐ Are your errors emitted with sensible location info?

### Testing Consideration Checklist

@@ -70,4 +77,3 @@ attention to that may not be tested by a feature's test262 tests_
  platform, such as `WindowProxy`, `Location` (cross-origin objects).
-  ☐ What happens when your feature interacts with
  [X-rays](/dom/scriptSecurity/xray_vision.rst)?
  
 No newline at end of file