Skip to content

"Unexpectedly high use successes counts", maybe one of reasons why users prefer to snowflake-01?

yyyy-mm-dd 01:27:10.293 [NOTICE] pathbias_count_use_success(): Bug: Unexpectedly high use successes counts (17.000000/16.000000) for guard $2B280B23E1107BB62ABFC40DDCC8824814F80A72 ($2B280B23E1107BB62ABFC40DDCC8824814F80A72) (on Tor 0.4.7.15 505ec7a64720e065)
yyyy-mm-dd 01:37:30.395 [NOTICE] pathbias_count_use_success(): Bug: Unexpectedly high use successes counts (23.000000/22.000000) for guard $2B280B23E1107BB62ABFC40DDCC8824814F80A72 ($2B280B23E1107BB62ABFC40DDCC8824814F80A72) (on Tor 0.4.7.15 505ec7a64720e065)
yyyy-mm-dd 02:43:42.139 [NOTICE] pathbias_count_use_success(): Bug: Unexpectedly high use successes counts (39.000000/38.000000) for guard $2B280B23E1107BB62ABFC40DDCC8824814F80A72 ($2B280B23E1107BB62ABFC40DDCC8824814F80A72) (on Tor 0.4.7.15 505ec7a64720e065)

TBB Version: 12.5.6 (based on Mozilla Firefox 102.15.1esr) (32-bit)
All three "Bug:" output lines are about snowflake-01, no snowflake-02 at all.
I don't know how to reproduce this phenomenon but I think maybe it is important for debug why seem users prefer to snowflake-01.