Commit 3af0d90a authored by Nick Mathewson's avatar Nick Mathewson 🤹
Browse files

r11767@catbus: nickm | 2007-02-12 14:56:03 -0500

 Mark proposal 106 accepted.


svn:r9567
parent da3cfa3d
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+8 −4
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Version: $Revision: 12105 $
Last-Modified: $Date: 2007-01-30T07:50:01.643717Z $
Author: Nick Mathewson
Created:
Status: Open
Status: Accepted

Overview:

@@ -71,6 +71,7 @@ a client and don't treat them as a server. great. -rd]
    there's really no harm in letting every router have any commonName it
    wants.
[this is the better choice -rd]
[agreed. -nm]

REMAINING WAYS TO RECOGNIZE CLIENT->SERVER CONNECTIONS:

@@ -91,8 +92,8 @@ If we stop verifying the above requirements:
    server running TLS, and believe that you're talking to a Tor server (until
    you send the first cell).

    It will be far easier for non-Tor SSL clients to accidentally to Tor servers
    and speak HTTPS or whatever to them.
    It will be far easier for non-Tor SSL clients to accidentally connect to
    Tor servers and speak HTTPS or whatever to them.

If, in a later release, we have clients not send certificates, and we make
DNs less recognizable:
@@ -104,5 +105,8 @@ DNs less recognizable:

    If clients don't send certs, they look slightly less like servers.

OTHER SPEC CHANGES:

When a client doesn't give us an identity, we should never extend any
circuits to it (duh), and we should allow it to set circuit ID however it
wants.