Loading doc/TODO.external +38 −7 Original line number Diff line number Diff line Loading @@ -25,9 +25,6 @@ C - coderman claims External constraints: Past due: N - Refine proposal 158, and implement. For June/July: NR - Work more on Paul's NRL research problem. Loading Loading @@ -81,9 +78,43 @@ IC- get a buildbot up again. Have Linux and BSD build machines. (Windows would be nice but realistically will come later.) E - Get Tor to work properly on the iPhone. 3.1.1, performance work. XXX 3.1, performance work. [Section numbers in here are from performance.pdf] - High-priority items from performance.pdf RS - 1.2, new circuit window sizes. make the default package window lower. R+ - 2.1, squeeze loud circuits - Evaluate the code to see what stats we can keep about circuit use. - Write proposals for various meddling. Look at the research papers that Juliusz pointed us to. Ask our systems friends. Plan to put a lot of the parameters in the consensus, so we can tune it with short turnaround times. E+ - 2.5, Change Vidalia's default exit policy to not click "other protocols". Or choose not to. Think this through first. R+ - 2.6, Tell users not to file-share. - Put statement on the Tor front page - Put statement on the download pages too - And the FAQ - 3.1.2, Tor weather I - Implement time-to-notification (immediate, a day, a week) R - Link to it from the Tor relay page R - and the torrc.sample SM - 4.1, balance traffic better - Steven and Mike should decide if we should do Steven's plan (rejigger the bandwidth numbers at the authorities based on Steven's algorithm), or Mike's plan (relay scanning to identify the unbalanced relays and fix them on the fly), or both. - Figure out how to actually modify bandwidths in the consensus. We may need to change the consensus voting algorithm to decide what bandwidth to advertise based on something other than median: if 7 authorities provide bandwidths, and 2 are doing scanning, then the 5 that aren't scanning will outvote any changes. Should all 7 scan? Should only some vote? Extra points if it doesn't change all the numbers every new consensus, so consensus diffing is still practical. ? - 4.5, Older entry guards are overloaded - Pick a conservative timeout like a month, and implement. M - 5.2, better timeouts for giving up on circuits/streams - clients gather data about circuit timeouts, and then abandon circuits that take more than a std dev above that. 4.1, IOCP / libevent / windows / tor N - get it working for nick Loading @@ -107,7 +138,7 @@ S - Have a clear plan for how users who become relays will be safe, involved in building them. 4.5, clients download less directory info N - deploy proposal 158. N * deploy proposal 158. N - decide whether to do proposal 140. if so, construct an implementation plan for how we'll do it. if not, explain why not. Loading Loading
doc/TODO.external +38 −7 Original line number Diff line number Diff line Loading @@ -25,9 +25,6 @@ C - coderman claims External constraints: Past due: N - Refine proposal 158, and implement. For June/July: NR - Work more on Paul's NRL research problem. Loading Loading @@ -81,9 +78,43 @@ IC- get a buildbot up again. Have Linux and BSD build machines. (Windows would be nice but realistically will come later.) E - Get Tor to work properly on the iPhone. 3.1.1, performance work. XXX 3.1, performance work. [Section numbers in here are from performance.pdf] - High-priority items from performance.pdf RS - 1.2, new circuit window sizes. make the default package window lower. R+ - 2.1, squeeze loud circuits - Evaluate the code to see what stats we can keep about circuit use. - Write proposals for various meddling. Look at the research papers that Juliusz pointed us to. Ask our systems friends. Plan to put a lot of the parameters in the consensus, so we can tune it with short turnaround times. E+ - 2.5, Change Vidalia's default exit policy to not click "other protocols". Or choose not to. Think this through first. R+ - 2.6, Tell users not to file-share. - Put statement on the Tor front page - Put statement on the download pages too - And the FAQ - 3.1.2, Tor weather I - Implement time-to-notification (immediate, a day, a week) R - Link to it from the Tor relay page R - and the torrc.sample SM - 4.1, balance traffic better - Steven and Mike should decide if we should do Steven's plan (rejigger the bandwidth numbers at the authorities based on Steven's algorithm), or Mike's plan (relay scanning to identify the unbalanced relays and fix them on the fly), or both. - Figure out how to actually modify bandwidths in the consensus. We may need to change the consensus voting algorithm to decide what bandwidth to advertise based on something other than median: if 7 authorities provide bandwidths, and 2 are doing scanning, then the 5 that aren't scanning will outvote any changes. Should all 7 scan? Should only some vote? Extra points if it doesn't change all the numbers every new consensus, so consensus diffing is still practical. ? - 4.5, Older entry guards are overloaded - Pick a conservative timeout like a month, and implement. M - 5.2, better timeouts for giving up on circuits/streams - clients gather data about circuit timeouts, and then abandon circuits that take more than a std dev above that. 4.1, IOCP / libevent / windows / tor N - get it working for nick Loading @@ -107,7 +138,7 @@ S - Have a clear plan for how users who become relays will be safe, involved in building them. 4.5, clients download less directory info N - deploy proposal 158. N * deploy proposal 158. N - decide whether to do proposal 140. if so, construct an implementation plan for how we'll do it. if not, explain why not. Loading