Consider changing the fallback process to opt-out
If we did this, we could rebuild the list by running a script, and occasionally collect opt-outs and add them to the blacklist.
I don't think this would worry anyone too much.
- Show closed items
Activity
-
Newest first Oldest first
-
Show all activity Show comments only Show history only
- teor changed milestone to %Tor: 0.3.4.x-final in legacy/trac
changed milestone to %Tor: 0.3.4.x-final in legacy/trac
- teor added component::core tor/fallback scripts in Legacy / Trac fallback in Legacy / Trac milestone::Tor: 0.3.4.x-final in Legacy / Trac points::1 in Legacy / Trac priority::medium in Legacy / Trac resolution::wontfix in Legacy / Trac severity::normal in Legacy / Trac status::closed in Legacy / Trac type::defect in Legacy / Trac labels
added component::core tor/fallback scripts in Legacy / Trac fallback in Legacy / Trac milestone::Tor: 0.3.4.x-final in Legacy / Trac points::1 in Legacy / Trac priority::medium in Legacy / Trac resolution::wontfix in Legacy / Trac severity::normal in Legacy / Trac status::closed in Legacy / Trac type::defect in Legacy / Trac labels
I am strongly discouraging this. Distributing the IP address in source code can get them flagged by some "security" software as C&C server (happened to my dirauth, caused a bunch of trouble but people knew to talk to me). We tell non-exits they basically don't have to worry about running a relay and I think that's no longer true with an opt-out process.
Un-parenting this ticket because it's done.
Trac:
Parent: legacy/trac#24786 (moved) to N/ARemove useless CC
Trac:
Cc: teor@torproject.org to N/A- Trac closed
closed
- Trac changed time estimate to 8h
changed time estimate to 8h
- teor mentioned in issue legacy/trac#26502 (moved)
mentioned in issue legacy/trac#26502 (moved)
- Trac moved from legacy/trac#24789 (moved)
moved from legacy/trac#24789 (moved)
- Trac added Fallback Directories label and removed 1 deleted label
added Fallback Directories label and removed 1 deleted label