We haven't had a notion of an HSAuthority since we dropped the v0 hidden service descriptor design completely back in 0.2.2. (See legacy/trac#10841 (moved) for more.) Specifically, in 0.2.2 or later, neither clients nor relays publish anything resembling a v0 hidden service descriptor, and "HS authorities" have nothing to do.
That said, we should drop the vestigial AlternativeHSAuthority option, since it has apparently has misled some folks into thinking that we do have HS authorities. (See legacy/trac#10722 (moved).)
To upload designs, you'll need to enable LFS and have an admin enable hashed storage. More information
Child items
0
Show closed items
No child items are currently assigned. Use child items to break down this issue into smaller parts.
Linked items
0
Link issues together to show that they're related.
Learn more.
Trac: Description: We haven't had a notion of an HSAuthority since we dropped the v0 hidden service descriptor design completely back in 0.2.2. (See legacy/trac#10849 (moved) for more.) Specifically, in 0.2.2 or later, neither clients nor relays publish anything resembling a v0 hidden service descriptor, and "HS authorities" have nothing to do.
That said, we should drop the vestigial AlternativeHSAuthority option, since it has apparently has misled some folks into thinking that we do have HS authorities. (See legacy/trac#10722 (moved).)
to
We haven't had a notion of an HSAuthority since we dropped the v0 hidden service descriptor design completely back in 0.2.2. (See legacy/trac#10841 (moved) for more.) Specifically, in 0.2.2 or later, neither clients nor relays publish anything resembling a v0 hidden service descriptor, and "HS authorities" have nothing to do.
That said, we should drop the vestigial AlternativeHSAuthority option, since it has apparently has misled some folks into thinking that we do have HS authorities. (See legacy/trac#10722 (moved).)
While looking through the changes, I found this part in the man page close to the changes in your bug10881 branch that isn't correct anymore since legacy/trac#10758 (moved). If you want a new ticket or branch for this, let me know.
diff --git a/doc/tor.1.txt b/doc/tor.1.txtindex e66fad2..36c1e3e 100644--- a/doc/tor.1.txt+++ b/doc/tor.1.txt@@ -331,8 +331,8 @@ GENERAL OPTIONS and port, with the specified key fingerprint. This option can be repeated many times, for multiple authoritative directory servers. Flags are separated by spaces, and determine what kind of an authority this directory- is. By default, every authority is authoritative for current ("v2")-style- directories, unless the "no-v2" flag is given. If the "v1" flags is+ is. By default, an authority is not authoritative for any directory style+ or version, unless one or more flags are given. If the "v1" flags is provided, Tor will use this server as an authority for old-style (v1) directories as well. (Only directory mirrors care about this.) Tor will use this authority as a bridge authoritative directory if the