Follow-up from "socks-extensions: editorial fixes"

The following discussion from !279 (merged) should be addressed:

@Diziet started a discussion: (+5 comments)

Err, isn't this not "just to support broken clients" but also for isolation? Ie, it ought to have cross-references to/from the section on isolation via socks auth parameters?

To upload designs, you'll need to enable LFS and have an admin enable hashed storage. More information