peer came up with a list of analysis ticket results and asks in legacy/trac#7241: > How are the blurbs at [doc/AnalysisTicketResults](doc/AnalysisTicketResults) (for metrics-tasks)? Were any tickets misinterpreted? Looks great! I didn't read all descriptions in detail, but I think it's a good start for people, and if something is wrong, they can always fix it. A few ideas: - Should tickets be listed in descending order, from newest to oldest? - Should we add a header saying that code for most of the tickets is available in the metrics-tasks.git repository? - Should we link to this wiki page from http://research.torproject.org/index.html, in particular in the "We're building a repository of tools" part, and throw out the link to the tools.html page?