Skip to content

GitLab

  • Projects
  • Groups
  • Snippets
  • Help
    • Loading...
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Sign in
S
sbws
  • Project overview
    • Project overview
    • Details
    • Activity
    • Releases
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributors
    • Graph
    • Compare
  • Issues 133
    • Issues 133
    • List
    • Boards
    • Labels
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
  • Merge Requests 4
    • Merge Requests 4
  • CI / CD
    • CI / CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Schedules
  • Operations
    • Operations
    • Incidents
    • Environments
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • CI / CD
    • Repository
    • Value Stream
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Snippets
    • Snippets
  • Members
    • Members
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar

GitLab is used only for code review, issue tracking and project management. Canonical locations for source code are still https://gitweb.torproject.org/ https://git.torproject.org/ and git-rw.torproject.org.

  • The Tor Project
  • Network Health
  • sbws
  • Issues
  • #16559

Closed
Open
Opened Jul 12, 2015 by TvdW@TvdW

bwauth code needs to be smarter about failed circuits

In the current bandwidth authority code, when a fetch attempt fails, it will still be counted as a circuit that went through all of the nodes -- even if those nodes weren't responsible for the failure.

This has the potential of resulting in a relay not being measured sufficiently, or at all: the code will consider failures from unstable nodes to be relevant for nodes that are perfectly stable.

In slices where exits and entries aren't well-distributed (like, all of them) this can result in some nodes not being measured at all, and losing their consensus weight. This seems to affect exits a lot more than it does other relay types: people on tor-relays@ have mentioned that removing their exit policies gets their consensus weight back, and I have been able to reproduce this.

Assignee
Assign to
sbws: unspecified
Milestone
sbws: unspecified
Assign milestone
Time tracking
None
Due date
None
Reference: tpo/network-health/sbws#16559