Verified Commit c5afe325 authored by anarcat's avatar anarcat
Browse files

some notes on tape backups

AKA "why we don't (currently) do tape backups"
parent 94907910
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+26 −0
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -1401,3 +1401,29 @@ TODO: populate Discussion section.
## Alternatives considered

<!-- include benchmarks and procedure if relevant -->

### Tape medium

Last I (anarcat) checked, the latest (published) LTO tape standard
stored a whopping 18TB of data, uncompressed, per cartridge and writes
400MB/s which means it takes 12h30m to fill up one tape.

LTO tapes are pretty cheap, e.g. [here is a 12TB LTO8 tape from Fuji
for 80$CAD](https://www.newegg.ca/p/12K-00EM-00011). The LTO tape *drives* are however prohibitively
expensive. For example, an "[upgrade kit](https://www.newegg.ca/hp-q6q68a-lto-ultrium-7-lto-ultrium-8/p/1HZ-00DX-00040)" for an HP tape library
sells for a whopping 7k$CAD here. I can't actually find any LTO-8 tape
drives on newegg.ca.

As a comparison, you can get a [18TB Seagate IronWolf drive for
410$CAD](https://www.newegg.ca/seagate-st18000ne000-18tb/p/N82E16822184872 ), which means for the price of that upgrade kit you can get
a whopping 300TB worth of HDDs for the price of the *tape drive*.  And
you don't have any actual tape yet, you'd need to shell out another
2k$CAD to get 300TB of 12TB tapes.

(Of course, that abstracts away the cost of running those hard
drives. You might dodge that issue by pretending you can use HDD
"trays" and hot-swap those drives around though, since that is
effectively how tapes work. So maybe for the cost of that 2k$ of
tapes, you could buy a 4U server with a bunch of slots for the hard
drive, which you would *still* need to do to host the tape drive
anyway.)