Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
Wiki Replica
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
Issue boards
Milestones
Wiki
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Snippets
Build
Pipelines
Jobs
Pipeline schedules
Artifacts
Deploy
Releases
Package registry
Container Registry
Model registry
Operate
Environments
Terraform modules
Monitor
Incidents
Service Desk
Analyze
Value stream analytics
Contributor analytics
CI/CD analytics
Repository analytics
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
Cecylia Bocovich
Wiki Replica
Commits
858c587d
Verified
Commit
858c587d
authored
3 years ago
by
anarcat
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
puppet: document my experience
parent
dacc52e8
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
Changes
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
howto/puppet.md
+11
-0
11 additions, 0 deletions
howto/puppet.md
with
11 additions
and
0 deletions
howto/puppet.md
+
11
−
0
View file @
858c587d
...
...
@@ -1943,6 +1943,17 @@ So, in short, it seems people are converging towards r10k with a
web hook. To validate git repositories, they mirror the repositories
to a private git host.
After writing this document, anarcat decided to try a setup with a
"control-repo" and
`g10k`
, because the latter can cryptographically
verify third-party repositories, either through a git hash or tarball
checksum. There's still only a single environment (I haven't
implemented the "create an environment on a new branch" hook). And it
often means two checkins when we work on shared modules, but that can
be alleviated by skipping the cryptographic check and trusting
transport by having the Puppetfile chase a branch name instead of a
checksum, during development. In production, of course, a checksum can
then be pinned again, but that is the biggest flaw in that workflow.
### Other alternatives
*
[
josh
](
https://github.com/josh-project/josh
)
: "Combine the advantages of a monorepo with those of
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment