Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
T
tor
Manage
Activity
Members
Code
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Build
Pipelines
Jobs
Pipeline schedules
Artifacts
Deploy
Releases
Package registry
Container Registry
Model registry
Operate
Terraform modules
Analyze
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
jarl
tor
Commits
9d8aec0e
Commit
9d8aec0e
authored
19 years ago
by
Roger Dingledine
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
last pieces of 0.1.1.9-alpha changelog
svn:r5373
parent
e022aa73
No related branches found
Branches containing commit
No related tags found
Tags containing commit
No related merge requests found
Changes
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
ChangeLog
+6
-0
6 additions, 0 deletions
ChangeLog
with
6 additions
and
0 deletions
ChangeLog
+
6
−
0
View file @
9d8aec0e
...
...
@@ -19,6 +19,8 @@ Changes in version 0.1.1.9-alpha - 2005-11-01
- Make directory authorities be non-versioning, non-naming by
default. Now we can add new directory servers without requiring
their operators to pay close attention.
- When logging via syslog, include the pid whenever we provide
a log entry. Suggested by Todd Fries.
o Performance improvements:
- Directory servers now silently throw away new descriptors that
...
...
@@ -51,6 +53,10 @@ Changes in version 0.1.1.9-alpha - 2005-11-01
- Do round-robin writes of at most 16 kB per write. This might be
more fair on loaded Tor servers, and it might resolve our Windows
crash bug. It might also slow things down.
- Our TLS handshakes were generating a single public/private
keypair for the TLS context, rather than making a new one for
each new connections. Oops. (But we were still rotating them
periodically, so it's not so bad.)
- When we were cannibalizing a circuit with a particular exit
node in mind, we weren't checking to see if that exit node was
already present earlier in the circuit. Oops.
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment