Skip to content

GitLab

  • Menu
Projects Groups Snippets
    • Loading...
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Sign in
  • Trac Trac
  • Project information
    • Project information
    • Activity
    • Labels
    • Members
  • Issues 246
    • Issues 246
    • List
    • Boards
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
  • Monitor
    • Monitor
    • Metrics
    • Incidents
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • Value stream
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Activity
  • Create a new issue
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar
  • Legacy
  • TracTrac
  • Issues
  • #1750

Closed (moved)
(moved)
Open
Created Jul 29, 2010 by Nick Mathewson@nickm🍬

Project: See if we can improve performance by throttling busy streams at guard nodes

In particular see http://archives.seul.org/or/dev/Dec-2009/msg00002.html and discussion stemming from Proposal 163. Basically, we want to keep individual clients from hammering the network too hard when we need the banwidth to relay traffic. We have a partial implementation, and Roger says that current next steps are performance measurements of some kind:

Look at bwconnrate and bwconnburst in the consensus. Next step is to do more rigorous performance comparisons (turn it on, off, on, off, compare torperf results).

Child Tickets: [[TicketQuery(parent=#1750 (moved))]]

To upload designs, you'll need to enable LFS and have an admin enable hashed storage. More information
Assignee
Assign to
Time tracking