Move obsolete specs to attic/ subdirectory
The bridge spec  suggests that bridges have both... BridgeRelay 1 PublishServerDescriptor bridge
in their torrc. The second is pointless and, according to Roger and Robert, this spec is kinda obsolete:
18:41 < atagar> The 'BridgeRelay 1' and 'PublishServerDescriptor bridge' seems kinda redundant. The bridge spec says to use both but the man page entry for 'BridgeRelay' says... 18:41 < atagar> 'It mainly causes Tor to publish a server descriptor to the bridge database, rather than publishing a relay descriptor to the public directory authorities.' 18:41 < atagar> Is the former just an alias for the second? Is there a reason we suggest that both are used? 18:44 < rransom__> atagar: Use 'BridgeRelay 1'. 18:45 < rransom__> 'PublishServerDescriptor bridge' doesn't make a relay answer directory requests. 18:52 < atagar> thanks - we should change that in the spec 18:52 * atagar will submit a ticket when he's on a connection that doesn't have 40-second-per-character latency 21:57 < armadev> atagar: the bridge spec is not what you should look at to decide how to configure your bridge. it's obsolete in that respect. 21:57 < armadev> for example, you don't need to touch publishserverdescriptor. it will automatically do the right thing. 22:38 < atagar> armadev: you still want to set it to zero for a private bridge, right? 22:39 < rransom__> Yes. 22:40 < atagar> 'not what you should look at to decide how to configure your bridge' -> What is? Is the torrc setup for bridges in an faq? (after a quick search it seemed like the spec was the best description we had) 22:41 < rransom__> bridge-spec.txt is obsolete. 22:42 < atagar> we should lable it as such, then 22:42 < rransom__> https://www.torproject.org/docs/bridges is about how to configure a bridge.
We should correct the spec, label it as being obsolete, or remove it to avoid future confusion.