Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
Tor
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
Issue boards
Milestones
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Build
Pipelines
Jobs
Pipeline schedules
Artifacts
Deploy
Releases
Package registry
Container registry
Model registry
Operate
Environments
Terraform modules
Monitor
Incidents
Service Desk
Analyze
Value stream analytics
Contributor analytics
CI/CD analytics
Repository analytics
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
sergi
Tor
Commits
528a1fe9
Commit
528a1fe9
authored
5 years ago
by
teor
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
changes: file for 33817
parent
bcec1ec0
Branches
Branches containing commit
Tags
Tags containing commit
No related merge requests found
Changes
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
changes/ticket33817
+12
-0
12 additions, 0 deletions
changes/ticket33817
with
12 additions
and
0 deletions
changes/ticket33817
0 → 100644
+
12
−
0
View file @
528a1fe9
o Major features (IPv6, relay):
- Relays may extend circuits over IPv6, if the relay has an IPv6 ORPort,
and the client supplies the other relay's IPv6 ORPort in the EXTEND2
cell. IPv6 extends will be used by the relay IPv6 ORPort self-tests in
33222. Closes ticket 33817.
- Consider IPv6-only EXTEND2 cells valid on relays. Log a protocol warning
if the IPv4 or IPv6 address is an internal address, and internal
addresses are not allowed. But continue to use the other address, if it
is valid. Closes ticket 33817.
- If a relay can extend over IPv4 and IPv6, it chooses between them
uniformly at random. Closes ticket 33817.
- Re-use existing IPv6 connections for circuit extends. Closes ticket 33817.
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment