Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
T
Tor
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
Issue boards
Milestones
Wiki
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Snippets
Build
Pipelines
Jobs
Pipeline schedules
Artifacts
Deploy
Releases
Package registry
Container Registry
Model registry
Operate
Environments
Terraform modules
Monitor
Incidents
Service Desk
Analyze
Value stream analytics
Contributor analytics
CI/CD analytics
Repository analytics
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
Benjamin J. Thompson
Tor
Commits
4200eb16
Commit
4200eb16
authored
18 years ago
by
Roger Dingledine
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
correct definition of Valid in dir-spec
svn:r8567
parent
ce72a991
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
Changes
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
doc/dir-spec.txt
+3
-3
3 additions, 3 deletions
doc/dir-spec.txt
with
3 additions
and
3 deletions
doc/dir-spec.txt
+
3
−
3
View file @
4200eb16
...
...
@@ -387,9 +387,9 @@ $Id$
authorities MAY do things differently, so long as clients keep working
well. Clients MUST NOT depend on the exact behaviors in this section.)
"Valid" -- a router is 'Valid' if it
seems to have been running well for a
while, and is running a version of Tor not known to be broken, and the
directory authority has not blacklisted
it as suspicious.
"Valid" -- a router is 'Valid' if it
is running a version of Tor not
known to be broken, and the directory authority has not blacklisted
it as suspicious.
"Named" -- Directory authority administrators may decide to support name
binding. If they do, then they must maintain a file of
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment