Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit 6feb149d authored by Nick Mathewson's avatar Nick Mathewson :game_die:
Browse files

Claim/assign some proposal-writing tasks for 0.2.2.

(Proposals assigned to others are purely in the realm of speculation.)
parent 36c2db2b
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
......@@ -12,6 +12,8 @@ NOTE 2: It's easy to list stuff like this with no time estimates and
- Begin design work for UDP transition; identify areas where we need to
make changes or instrument stuff early.
[multiple weeks, ongoing. Need to do a draft early.]
- Performance, mostly protocol-neutral.
- Work with Libevent 2.0's bufferevent interface
- Identify any performance stuff we need to push back into
......@@ -44,7 +46,7 @@ NOTE 2: It's easy to list stuff like this with no time estimates and
- Other features
- Proposals to implement:
- 146: reflect long-term stability
- 146: reflect long-term stability in consensuses
- 147: Stop using v2 directories to generate v3 votes.
- Start pinging as soon as we learn about a relay, not on a
22-minute cycle. Prioritize new and volatile relays for
......@@ -52,7 +54,9 @@ NOTE 2: It's easy to list stuff like this with no time estimates and
- Proposals to improve and implement
- 158: microdescriptors
N - Revise proposal
- 160: list bandwidth in consensus
RNM? - Finish proposal
- and actually set it reasonably
- and actually use it.
......@@ -65,15 +69,24 @@ NOTE 2: It's easy to list stuff like this with no time estimates and
- Needs a proposal, or at least some design
- Detect client-status better
N - Write proposal
- Have authorities report relay and voting status better: make it
easy to answer, "Why is my server not listed/not Guard/not
Running/etc"
N - Write proposal
- Have consensuses come in multiple "flavours".
N - Write proposal
- Weaken the requirements for being a Guard, based on K's
measurements.
K - Finish measurements
K? - Write proposal
- Adaptive timeouts for giving up on circuits and streams.
- Have weight for picking new nodes as guards be less stupid
M/N - Revise proposal 151
- Downweight guards more sensibly: be more forgiving about using
Guard nodes as non-first-hop.
- Write proposal.
- Lagged weight updates in consensuses: don't just move abruptly.
M? - Write proposal
d Don't kill a circuit on the first failed extend.
- Installers
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment