Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit ed4a3dfe authored by Nick Mathewson's avatar Nick Mathewson :game_die:
Browse files

Remove XXXXprop271 comments from test_entrynodes.c

These commments were complaints about how I didn't like some aspects
of prop271.  They have been superseded by ticket 20832.
parent 7d0df8ba
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
......@@ -2044,7 +2044,6 @@ test_entry_guard_select_for_circuit_highlevel_confirm_other(void *arg)
u = entry_guard_succeeded(&guard);
/* We're on the internet (by fiat), so this guard will get called "confirmed"
* and should immediately become primary.
* XXXX prop271 -- I don't like that behavior, but it's what is specified
*/
tt_int_op(guard->state, OP_EQ, GUARD_CIRC_STATE_COMPLETE);
tt_assert(u == GUARD_USABLE_NOW);
......@@ -2338,9 +2337,6 @@ test_entry_guard_upgrade_a_circuit(void *arg)
* primary guards are down, we have two WAITING circuits: one will
* get upgraded to COMPLETED! (The one that started first.)
*/
/* XXXX prop271 -- perhaps the one that started first should
* also wind up in confirmed_entry_guards earlier?
*/
smartlist_t *result = smartlist_new();
int r;
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment