Oh I know that - I live on bugzilla I just wanted to highlight myself, I'm feeling lonely
I was just pointing out that the previous fix obviously wasn't a fix. I have done a fair bit of reading/testing re RFP font protections (and making sure they worked with RFP on at least windows) and been part of three or four fixes already. I should have clicked way earlier that it was the bundled fonts, but I know nothing about how TB Linux compiles the font whitelist or whatever. I am surprised the bundled ones were ever detected as system ones - legacy issues perhaps. I hope you reverse that to not diverge from upstream
Thanks for the reminder, I forgot again to ask last Monday.
Actually, keeping it is okay for me. It does not hurt, and it can be a fallback in case the bundled fonts mechanism has some bugs...
(Although this can be a disadvantage, because we should notice bugs, instead of keeping them quiet).
@boklm did you add the fonts.conf file originally?
In case, do you remember if there is a reason behind the <dir>fonts</dir>?
I think bundled fonts should be detected as bundled - who knows what jonathan kew's patches could spring in future and whitelist is not "supported" - and I couldn't have tested whitelist on Linux UNTIL you built alpha ESR91, unlike I did test windows well before time (and got someone else to test mac). Interested in boklm's thoughts/answer