ESR128 - check protocol handling
Designs
- Show closed items
Activity
-
Newest first Oldest first
-
Show all activity Show comments only Show history only
- Maintainer
Let's keep this open for now, we'll deal with this when reviewing prefs (we usually do additional blocks for defense in depth IIRC).
Edited by Pier Angelo Vendrame - Pier Angelo Vendrame removed Disk Leak label
removed Disk Leak label
- Pier Angelo Vendrame added Proxy Bypass label
added Proxy Bypass label
- Pier Angelo Vendrame marked this issue as related to #42356 (closed)
marked this issue as related to #42356 (closed)
- morgan added 14.0 stable label
added 14.0 stable label
- morgan added Roadmap::Future label
added Roadmap::Future label
- morgan added All Platforms label
added All Platforms label
I'll drop this here: i think mailto handlers were ok from a TB/MB perspective?
- FF121+ Allow setting the browser as the OS default mailto handler
- pref("browser.mailto.dualPrompt", false);
- pref("browser.mailto.dualPrompt.os", false);
- pref("browser.mailto.prompt.os", true);
- FF121+ Allow setting the browser as the OS default mailto handler
Collapse replies - Maintainer
Adding it to mullvad-browser#178.
- Pier Angelo Vendrame mentioned in issue mullvad-browser#178
mentioned in issue mullvad-browser#178
- morgan marked this issue as related to #42751 (closed)
marked this issue as related to #42751 (closed)
- morgan mentioned in issue #42751 (closed)
mentioned in issue #42751 (closed)
- morgan removed Roadmap::Future label
removed Roadmap::Future label
Related to #42356 (closed)
No changes in the protocol handlers "safe" list between esr115 and esr128:
$ schemes () { git show $1:dom/base/Navigator.cpp | grep -A100 'const kSafeSchemes' | grep -m1 -B100 '}' | grep '".*"'; }; diff <(schemes upstream/tor-browser-128.2.0esr-14.0-1) <(schemes upstream/tor-browser-115.15.0esr-13.5-1) && echo "NO CHANGE"; NO CHANGE
Edited by ma1- ma1 closed
closed
Please register or sign in to reply