Skip to content

AppArmor: remove duplicate rule

We already include the gnome abstraction, which itself includes the X abstraction, so at least in theory including the X abstraction explicitly should be a no-op.

It looks like adding this line was done based on an incorrect assumption (that Lubuntu does not include the gnome abstraction), and even if that assumption were correct, adding this line would not fix the problem (because the parser would fail to compile the profile regardless).

If there's ever evidence of a system where this line actually solves a problem, we can reconsider, and I'll be very curious to understand why.

Edited by intrigeri

Merge request reports

Loading