I mean, it's even spelled out in the document that this isn't a proper policy, but we'd put it under policies on the site now. That is just an inco...

@sebastian: I am confused by this statement. The plan we made in Lisbon was to create a bad-relays policy v0 containing the current status quo. Tha...

Not sure I'd want to merge this. It's not a policy, it's a documentation of the status quo, but it'd appear under policies IIUIC

This is superseded by !84 (merged)

Closing in favor of !86.

@arma: feel free to assign this review request to someone else for the dir-auth crowd. It just felt wrong to request a review without picking someo...

This is superseding !82 (closed).

Yeah. I think the requirement is only to get a majority of them exclude those relays. How that looks like in practice or in detail is up to the dir...