Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
T
tor
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Build
Pipelines
Jobs
Pipeline schedules
Artifacts
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
The Tor Project
Core
debian
tor
Commits
d72edc4b
Commit
d72edc4b
authored
14 years ago
by
Nick Mathewson
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
Edit the changelog to reflect the fact that we are backing off on ending NOROUTE for now
parent
8c528bc3
No related branches found
Branches containing commit
No related tags found
Tags containing commit
No related merge requests found
Changes
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
ChangeLog
+5
-3
5 additions, 3 deletions
ChangeLog
with
5 additions
and
3 deletions
ChangeLog
+
5
−
3
View file @
d72edc4b
...
...
@@ -71,9 +71,11 @@ Changes in version 0.2.2.15-alpha - 2010-08-1?
a randomly generated port is 0. Diagnosed by Matt Edman. Bugfix
on 0.2.0.10-alpha; fixes bug 1808.
- Exit nodes didn't recognize EHOSTUNREACH as a plausible error code,
and so sent back END_STREAM_REASON_MISC. They now send a new stream
ending reason: END_STREAM_REASON_NOROUTE. Also update the spec to
reflect this new reason. Bugfix on 0.1.0.1-rc; fixes bug 1793.
and so sent back END_STREAM_REASON_MISC. Clients now recognize a new
stream ending reason for this case: END_STREAM_REASON_NOROUTE.
Servers can start sending this code when enough clients recognize
it. Also update the spec to reflect this new reason. Bugfix on
0.1.0.1-rc; fixes bug 1793.
- Instead of giving an assertion failure on an internal mismatch
on estimated freelist size, just log a BUG warning and try later.
Mitigates but does not fix bug 1125.
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment