- Mar 09, 2010
-
-
Roger Dingledine authored
-
- Mar 08, 2010
-
-
Roger Dingledine authored
now's your chance to destabilize it
-
- Mar 07, 2010
-
-
Roger Dingledine authored
Conflicts: ChangeLog configure.in contrib/tor-mingw.nsi.in src/win32/orconfig.h
-
Roger Dingledine authored
- Mar 05, 2010
-
-
Nick Mathewson authored
Apparently this is not as obvious as I thought.
-
Roger Dingledine authored
-
Nick Mathewson authored
-
- Mar 04, 2010
-
-
Nick Mathewson authored
Conflicts: src/or/config.c src/or/test.c
-
Nick Mathewson authored
From http://archives.seul.org/tor/relays/Mar-2010/msg00006.html : As I understand it, the bug should show up on relays that don't set Address to an IP address (so they need to resolve their Address line or their hostname to guess their IP address), and their hostname or Address line fails to resolve -- at that point they'll pick a random 4 bytes out of memory and call that their address. At the same time, relays that *do* successfully resolve their address will ignore the result, and only come up with a useful address if their interface address happens to be a public IP address.
-
Nick Mathewson authored
-
Mike Perry authored
Also, differentiate the two log messages.
-
-
Roger Dingledine authored
-
Mike Perry authored
I still feel like we should investigate this case. It seems odd.
-
- Mar 02, 2010
-
-
-
Nick Mathewson authored
-
- Mar 01, 2010
-
-
Sebastian Hahn authored
Also break the build if that switch isn't used and asciidoc isn't available.
-
Sebastian Hahn authored
We don't need sed for our string manipulation, so let's get rid of it. Suggested by weasel.
-
Sebastian Hahn authored
Otherwise, the build process breaks when one of the .1.txt gets a new mtime. Suggested by weasel.
-
- Feb 28, 2010
-
-
Nick Mathewson authored
-
- Feb 27, 2010
-
-
Nick Mathewson authored
-
Nick Mathewson authored
Conflicts: src/common/test.h src/or/test.c
-
Nick Mathewson authored
-
Nick Mathewson authored
When the bandwidth-weights branch added the "directory-footer" token, and began parsing the directory footer at the first occurrence of "directory-footer", it made it possible to fool the parsing algorithm into accepting unsigned data at the end of a consensus or vote. This patch fixes that bug by treating the footer as starting with the first "directory-footer" or the first "directory-signature", whichever comes first.
-
Nick Mathewson authored
-
Nick Mathewson authored
Conflicts: ChangeLog src/or/routerparse.c
-
Sebastian Hahn authored
Treat strings returned from signed_descriptor_get_body_impl() as not NUL-terminated. Since the length of the strings is available, this is not a big problem. Discovered by rieo.
-
Mike Perry authored
-
- Feb 26, 2010
-
-
Sebastian Hahn authored
-
Nick Mathewson authored
Don't allow anything but directory-signature tokens in a consensus after the first directory-signature token. Fixes bug in bandwidth-weights branch. Found by "outofwords."
-
Sebastian Hahn authored
Another dereference-then-NULL-check sequence. No reports of this bug triggered in the wild. Fixes bugreport 1256. Thanks to ekir for discovering and reporting this bug.
-
Sebastian Hahn authored
Fix a dereference-then-NULL-check sequence. This bug wasn't triggered in the wild, but we should fix it anyways in case it ever happens. Also make sure users get a note about this being a bug when they see it in their log. Thanks to ekir for discovering and reporting this bug.
-
Sebastian Hahn authored
We used to only zero the first ptrsize bytes of the cipher. Since cipher is large enough, we didn't zero too many bytes. Discovered and fixed by ekir. Fixes bug 1254.
-
- Feb 25, 2010
-
-
Nick Mathewson authored
-
Nick Mathewson authored
This means that "if (E<G) {abc} else if (E>=G) {def}" can be replaced with "if (E<G) {abc} else {def}" Doing the second test explicitly made my mingw gcc nervous that we might never be initializing casename.
-
Nick Mathewson authored
-
Nick Mathewson authored
For my 64-bit Linux system running with GCC 4.4.3-fc12-whatever, you can't do 'printf("%lld", (int64_t)x);' Instead you need to tell the compiler 'printf("%lld", (long long int)x);' or else it doesn't believe the types match. This is why we added U64_PRINTF_ARG; it looks like we needed an I64_PRINTF_ARG too.
-
Nick Mathewson authored
Conflicts: ChangeLog
-