Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
Tor
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
Issue boards
Milestones
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Build
Pipelines
Jobs
Pipeline schedules
Artifacts
Deploy
Container Registry
Model registry
Monitor
Incidents
Service Desk
Analyze
Value stream analytics
Contributor analytics
CI/CD analytics
Repository analytics
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
The Tor Project
Core
Tor
Commits
a4fb12a4
Commit
a4fb12a4
authored
18 years ago
by
Nick Mathewson
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
r12355@catbus: nickm | 2007-04-14 11:52:20 -0400
Rename DNSBL to DNSEL. svn:r9952
parent
a3fda1ba
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
Changes
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
doc/contrib/torbl-design.txt
+12
-12
12 additions, 12 deletions
doc/contrib/torbl-design.txt
with
12 additions
and
12 deletions
doc/contrib/torbl-design.txt
+
12
−
12
View file @
a4fb12a4
Design For A Tor
RBL {DRAFT}
Design For A Tor
DNS-based Exit List
Status:
This is a suggested design for a DNS
BL
for Tor exit nodes.
It hasn't been
implemented.
This is a suggested design for a DNS
Exit List (DNSEL)
for Tor exit nodes.
It hasn't been
implemented.
Why?
...
...
@@ -29,10 +29,10 @@ Why?
identify which Tor nodes might open anonymous connections to any given
exit address. But this is a bit tricky to set up, so only sites like
Freenode and OFTC that are dedicated to privacy use it.
Conversely, providers of some DNS
B
L implementations are providing
Conversely, providers of some DNS
E
L implementations are providing
coarse-grained lists of Tor hosts -- sometimes even listing servers that
permit no exit connections at all. This is rather a problem, since
support for DNS
B
L is pretty ubiquitous.
support for DNS
E
L is pretty ubiquitous.
How?
...
...
@@ -54,13 +54,13 @@ How?
The DNS interface
DNS
B
L, if I understand right, looks like this:
There's some host
at
foo.example.com. You want to know if 1.2.3.4 is in the list, so you
query for an A record for 4.3.2.1.foo.example.com. If the record
exists,
1.2.3.4 is in the list. If you get an NXDOMAIN error, 1.2.3.4
is not in
the list.
Standard
DNS
E
L, if I understand right, looks like this: There's some host
at
foo.example.com. You want to know if 1.2.3.4 is in the list, so you
query for an A record for 4.3.2.1.foo.example.com. If the record
exists,
1.2.3.4 is in the list. If you get an NXDOMAIN error, 1.2.3.4
is not in
the list.
Assume that the DNS
B
L sits at some host, torhosts.example.com. Below
Assume that the DNS
E
L sits at some host, torhosts.example.com. Below
are some queries that could be supported, though some of them are
possibly a bad idea.
...
...
@@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ Other issues:
masks wider than /8 make me nervous here, as do port ranges.
We need an answer for what to do about hosts which exit from different
IPs than their advertised IP. One approach would be for the DNS
B
L
IPs than their advertised IP. One approach would be for the DNS
E
L
to launch periodic requests to itself through all exit servers whose
policies allow it -- and then see where the requests actually come from.
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment