Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit b1e61353 authored by Roger Dingledine's avatar Roger Dingledine Committed by Nick Mathewson
Browse files

note that proposal 160 is written. note that section 4.5 is done.

parent 05e55d82
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
......@@ -84,16 +84,9 @@ SM - 4.1, balance traffic better
(rejigger the bandwidth numbers at the authorities based on
Steven's algorithm), or Mike's plan (relay scanning to identify
the unbalanced relays and fix them on the fly), or both.
- Figure out how to actually modify bandwidths in the consensus. We
may need to change the consensus voting algorithm to decide what
bandwidth to advertise based on something other than median:
if 7 authorities provide bandwidths, and 2 are doing scanning,
then the 5 that aren't scanning will outvote any changes. Should
all 7 scan? Should only some vote? Extra points if it doesn't
change all the numbers every new consensus, so consensus diffing
is still practical.
? - 4.5, Older entry guards are overloaded
- Pick a conservative timeout like a month, and implement.
- Implement Proposal 160
o 4.5, Older entry guards are overloaded
o Pick a conservative timeout like a month, and implement.
M - 5.2, better timeouts for giving up on circuits/streams
- clients gather data about circuit timeouts, and then abandon
circuits that take more than a std dev above that.
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment