Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
Tor
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
Issue boards
Milestones
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Build
Pipelines
Jobs
Pipeline schedules
Artifacts
Deploy
Container Registry
Model registry
Monitor
Incidents
Service Desk
Analyze
Value stream analytics
Contributor analytics
CI/CD analytics
Repository analytics
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
The Tor Project
Core
Tor
Commits
c7d3ecab
Commit
c7d3ecab
authored
11 years ago
by
Roger Dingledine
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
new location for tarballs; and you should edit Makefile too
parent
ca2a88fa
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
Changes
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
doc/HACKING
+2
-6
2 additions, 6 deletions
doc/HACKING
with
2 additions
and
6 deletions
doc/HACKING
+
2
−
6
View file @
c7d3ecab
...
...
@@ -489,12 +489,8 @@ in their approved versions list.
8) scp the tarball and its sig to the website in the dist/ directory
(i.e. /srv/www-master.torproject.org/htdocs/dist/ on vescum). Edit
include/versions.wmi to note the new version. From your website checkout,
run ./publish to build and publish the website.
Try not to delay too much between scp'ing the tarball and running
./publish -- the website has multiple A records and your scp only sent
it to one of them.
"include/versions.wmi" and "Makefile" to note the new version. From your
website checkout, run ./publish to build and publish the website.
9) Email Erinn and weasel (cc'ing tor-assistants) that a new tarball
is up. This step should probably change to mailing more packagers.
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment