Skip to content

GitLab

  • Projects
  • Groups
  • Snippets
  • Help
    • Loading...
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Sign in
T
Tor
  • Project overview
    • Project overview
    • Details
    • Activity
    • Releases
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributors
    • Graph
    • Compare
  • Issues 1,066
    • Issues 1,066
    • List
    • Boards
    • Labels
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
  • Merge Requests 17
    • Merge Requests 17
  • CI / CD
    • CI / CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Schedules
  • Operations
    • Operations
    • Incidents
    • Environments
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • CI / CD
    • Repository
    • Value Stream
  • Members
    • Members
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar

GitLab is used only for code review, issue tracking and project management. Canonical locations for source code are still https://gitweb.torproject.org/ https://git.torproject.org/ and git-rw.torproject.org.

  • The Tor Project
  • Core
  • Tor
  • Issues
  • #19179

Closed
Open
Opened May 26, 2016 by George Kadianakis@asnOwner

Refactor functions that handle 'packages' in consensus/votes

This is a side issue of legacy/trac#18840 (moved).

The code managing packages for consensuses and votes seems to be of particularly low quality.

See compute_consensus_package_lines() doing ad-hoc parsing. And see validate_recommended_package_line() doing more ad-hoc parsing and having wrong return value patterns. Fortunately, both of them are weakly tested in the unittests.

Maybe we should refactor and add more testing for these funcs?

To upload designs, you'll need to enable LFS and have an admin enable hashed storage. More information
Assignee
Assign to
Tor: unspecified
Milestone
Tor: unspecified
Assign milestone
Time tracking
None
Due date
None
Reference: tpo/core/tor#19179