Skip to content

GitLab

  • Menu
Projects Groups Snippets
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Sign in
  • T Tor Specifications
  • Project information
    • Project information
    • Activity
    • Labels
    • Members
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributors
    • Graph
    • Compare
  • Issues 80
    • Issues 80
    • List
    • Boards
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
  • Merge requests 3
    • Merge requests 3
  • CI/CD
    • CI/CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Schedules
  • Deployments
    • Deployments
    • Environments
    • Releases
  • Monitor
    • Monitor
    • Incidents
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • Value stream
    • CI/CD
    • Repository
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar
  • The Tor Project
  • Core
  • Tor Specifications
  • Issues
  • #77

Closed
Open
Created Jan 06, 2022 by Ian Jackson@DizietMaintainer

Leakiness of hidden service presence due to startup circuits

In path-spec.txt we have:

Specifically, on startup Tor tries to maintain one clean fast exit circuit that allows connections to port 80, and at least two fast clean stable internal circuits in case we get a resolve request or hidden service request (at least three if we run a hidden service).

Doesn't this mean our guard can see if we run a hidden service? But is that true anyway? Do we care? (Is this in fact true of the C implementation? What should we do in Arti?)

@nickm says the guard will probably be able to figure out if we are running an onion service anyway, based on timing and suggested @mikeperry would have good insight on this issue.

To upload designs, you'll need to enable LFS and have an admin enable hashed storage. More information
Assignee
Assign to
Time tracking