Prop#349: Decouple validation from prop#340 packing

If we specify the state machines independently from prop#340, everything ends up cleaner.

This came out of discussions with @jnewsome

Cc: @dgoulet

requested review from @jnewsome

assigned to @mikeperry

added 1 commit

• 377bf42d - Prop#349: Remove obsolte reference to prop#340

Compare with previous version

requested review from @jnewsome

I think I'm failing at gitlab; I don't see a button so submit another "review" and hit "approve". Maybe it's just as well that @dgoulet have a look too, though.

But yeah, LGTM. As per my comments I think there is room for explaining things a bit better, but I think it's an improvement as-is.

added 2 commits

• 7d9ecd9a - fixup! Prop#349: Decouple validation from prop#340 packing
• bd5e045f - fixup! Prop#349: Decouple validation from prop#340 packing

Compare with previous version

marked this merge request as draft from mikeperry/torspec@7d9ecd9a

marked this merge request as ready

resolved all threads

mentioned in issue #314

added 1 commit

• c137512a - fixup! Prop#349: Decouple validation from prop#340 packing

Compare with previous version

marked this merge request as draft from mikeperry/torspec@c137512a

marked this merge request as ready

approved this merge request

resolved all threads