Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
Wiki Replica
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
Issue boards
Milestones
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Build
Pipelines
Jobs
Pipeline schedules
Artifacts
Deploy
Releases
Container Registry
Model registry
Operate
Environments
Monitor
Incidents
Analyze
Value stream analytics
Contributor analytics
CI/CD analytics
Repository analytics
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
The Tor Project
TPA
Wiki Replica
Commits
7cd390ed
Verified
Commit
7cd390ed
authored
3 years ago
by
anarcat
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
draft the SVN retirement proposal
parent
2764c8c7
No related branches found
Branches containing commit
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
Changes
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
policy/tpa-rfc-11-svn-retirement.md
+118
-0
118 additions, 0 deletions
policy/tpa-rfc-11-svn-retirement.md
with
118 additions
and
0 deletions
policy/tpa-rfc-11-svn-retirement.md
0 → 100644
+
118
−
0
View file @
7cd390ed
---
title: TPA-RFC-11
:
SVN retirement
---
[[
_TOC_
]]
Summary: SVN will be retired by the end of 2021, in favor of
Nextcloud.
# Background
SVN (short for Subversion) is a version control system that is
currently used inside the Tor Project to manage private files like
contacts, accounting data, forms. It was also previously used to host
source code but that has all been archived and generally migrated to
the git service.
The SVN server (called
`gayi`
) is not very well maintained, and has
too few service admins (if any? TBD) to be considered
well-maintained. Its retirement has been explicitly called for many
times over the years:
*
[
2012: migrate SVN to git
](
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/tpa/team/-/issues/4929
)
*
[
2015: shut down SVN
](
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/tpa/team/-/issues/17202
)
... by 2016, no explicit solution proposed
*
[
2015: move to Sparkleshare
](
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/tpa/team/-/issues/17719
)
*
[
2019: move to Nextcloud
](
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/tpa/team/-/issues/31540
)
*
[
2020: user survey
](
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/tpa/team/-/wikis/roadmap/2021#survey-results
)
(
3%
of respondents want to retire SVN)
An
[
audit of the SVN server
](
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/tpa/team/-/issues/33537
)
has documented the overly
[
complex
access control mechanisms
](
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/tpa/team/-/wikis/howto/svn/#design
)
of the server as well.
For all those reasons, the TPA team wishes to retire the SVN server,
as was proposed (and adopted) in the 2021 roadmap.
Many replacement services are considered for SVN:
*
git or GitLab: GitLab has private repositories and wikis, but it is
generally considered that its attack surface is too broad for
private content, and besides, it is probably not usable enough
compared to the WebDAV/SVN interface currently in use
*
Nextcloud: may solve usability requirements, may have privacy
concerns (ie. who is a Nextcloud admin?)
*
Google Docs: currently in use for some document writing because of
limitation of the Nextcloud collaborative editor
*
Granthub: currently in use for grant writing?
## Requirements
In
[
issue 32273
][]
, a set of requirements was proposed:
[
issue 32273
]:
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/tpa/team/-/issues/32273
*
**permanence**
- there should be
**backups**
and no data loss in
the event of an attack or hardware failure
*
**archival**
- old data should eventually be
**pruned**
, for
example personal information about past employees should not be
kept forever, financial records can be destroyed after some legal
limit, etc.
*
**privilege separation**
- some of the stuff is
**private**
from
the public, or even to tor-internal members. we need to clearly
define what those boundaries are and are strongly they need to be
(e.g. are Nextcloud access controls? sufficient? can we put stuff
on Google Docs? what about share.riseup.net or pad.riseup.net? etc)
# Proposal
The proposal is to retire the SVN service by December 1st 2021. All
documents hosted on the server shall be migrated to another service
before that date.
TPA suggests SVN users adopt Nextcloud as the replacement platform,
but other platforms may be used as deemed fit by the users. Users are
strongly encouraged to consult with TPA before picking alternate
platforms.
## Timeline
*
November 1st 2021: reminder sent to SVN users to move their data
out.
*
December 1st 2021: SVN server (
`gayi`
) retired with an extra 60
days retention period (ie. the server can be restarted easily for 2
months)
*
~February 1st 2022: SVN server (
`gayi`
) destroyed, backups kept for
another 60 days
*
~April 1st 2022: all SVN data destroyed
## Affected users
It is believe that
`sue`
is the only remaining user of the SVN
service. Remains TBD.
# Approvals
This proposal needs to be explicitly approved by TPA, but also by all
operations people, and especially current SVN users.
# Deadline
This proposal should be adopted before October 1st 2021,
tentatively. It will be sent out some time in August 2021, after a
direct call with Sue.
# Status
This proposal is currently in the
`draft`
state.
# References
*
[
SVN documentation
](
howto/svn
)
*
[
issue 17202
](
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/tpa/team/-/issues/17202
)
: "Shut down SVN and decomission the host (gayi)",
main ticket to track the host retirement, includes:
*
[
issue 32273
][]
: "archive private information from SVN", includes:
*
[
corpsvn data inventory
](
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/tpa/team/-/issues/32273#note_2542833
)
, including "currently" used file
management tools and alternatives
*
[
issue 32025
][]
: "Stop using corpsvn and disable it as a service"
*
[
issue 40260
](
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/tpa/team/-/issues/40260
)
: "TPA-RFC-11: SVN retirement", discussion ticket
[
issue 32025
]:
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/tpa/team/-/issues/32025
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment