Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
Wiki Replica
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
Issue boards
Milestones
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Build
Pipelines
Jobs
Pipeline schedules
Artifacts
Deploy
Releases
Container Registry
Model registry
Operate
Environments
Monitor
Incidents
Analyze
Value stream analytics
Contributor analytics
CI/CD analytics
Repository analytics
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
The Tor Project
TPA
Wiki Replica
Commits
e3bcef06
Verified
Commit
e3bcef06
authored
2 years ago
by
anarcat
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
mention another dropped option
parent
80676fda
No related branches found
Branches containing commit
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
Changes
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
policy/tpa-rfc-15-email-services.md
+24
-0
24 additions, 0 deletions
policy/tpa-rfc-15-email-services.md
with
24 additions
and
0 deletions
policy/tpa-rfc-15-email-services.md
+
24
−
0
View file @
e3bcef06
...
...
@@ -649,6 +649,30 @@ replication for a "warm" spare.
Multi-primary setups would require "sharding" the users across
multiple servers and is definitely considered out of scope.
## Personal SPF/DKIM records and partial external hosting
At Debian.org, it's possible for members to configure their own DKIM
records which allows them to sign their personal, outgoing email with
their own DKIM keys and send signed emails out to the world from their
own email. We will not support such a configuration, as it is
considered too complex to setup for normal users.
Furthermore, it would not
*easily*
help people currently hosted by
Gmail or Riseup: while it's technically possible for users to
*individually*
delegate their DKIM signatures to those entities, those
keys could change without notice and would immediately break.
DMARC has similar problems, particularly with monitoring and error
reporting.
Delegating SPF records might be slightly easier (because delegation is
built into the protocol), but has also been rejected for now. It is
considered risky to grant
*all*
of Gmail the rights to masquerade as
`torproject.org`
(even though that's currently the status quo). And
besides delegating SPF alone wouldn't solve the more general problem
of
*partially*
allowing third parties to send mail as
`@torproject.org`
(because of DKIM and DMARC).
## Status quo
The current status quo is also an option. But it is our belief that it
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment