thanks!
Hmm, if pastly would agree to change ownership from GH/pastly/simple-bw-scanner to GH/torproject/sbws, we won't need to migrate issues/PR, though GH/torproject/sbws should be deleted.
push current GH/pastly/simple-bw-scanner master to it
I think pastly or juga should do this when they're happy with the state of master.
if we continue main development in the master branch and tag/release only specific commits, master should be the same as it is now in /pastly, and i could push it myself.
I'm guessing that pastly knows more about the master branch, so the next step is his.
In the meanwhile i changed my mind and i thought it would be faster/cleaner if we don't transfer the repo.
But teor, pastly, go ahead with whatever is faster so i can continue making PRs or pushing my work.
I've pushed the master branch to torproject/sbws on GH, but think juga's comment above is a good idea. To elaborate:
Let's use the transfer ownership functionality of GH. That way we can keep the existing issues and PRs.
And forks!
Teor should be able to delete torproject/sbws and torproject/simple-bw-scanner. Please do that.
I deleted sbws, but I archived simple-bw-scanner to simple-bw-scanner-old. We can delete it when we're done.
Once that's done, pastly can transfer ownership of pastly/simple-bw-scanner to torproject/simple-bw-scanner. This should maintain tickets/PRs.
You should probably delete your personal branches after the transfer.
If you want to preserve that history, you can re-push them to a new personal fork.
Once that's done, pastly/juga/teor can rename torproject/simple-bw-scanner to torproject/sbws
Once that's done, someone can setup syncing of git.tpo/sbws with torproject/sbws