Skip to content

GitLab

  • Menu
Projects Groups Snippets
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Sign in
  • rdsys rdsys
  • Project information
    • Project information
    • Activity
    • Labels
    • Members
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributors
    • Graph
    • Compare
  • Issues 49
    • Issues 49
    • List
    • Boards
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
  • Merge requests 1
    • Merge requests 1
  • CI/CD
    • CI/CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Schedules
  • Deployments
    • Deployments
    • Environments
    • Releases
  • Packages & Registries
    • Packages & Registries
    • Package Registry
    • Infrastructure Registry
  • Monitor
    • Monitor
    • Incidents
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • Value stream
    • CI/CD
    • Repository
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Snippets
    • Snippets
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar
  • The Tor Project
  • Anti-censorship
  • rdsysrdsys
  • Issues
  • #69
Closed
Open
Created Nov 10, 2021 by meskio@meskio👷Owner

Do we want to take into account the requester IP address?

AFAIK the existing BridgeDB https and moat distributors do take into account the requester IP address, it does have bridgerings for different IP ranges so we only provide bridges from that bridgering to that IP range.

While bridgedb is being used as distributor of rdsys (#12 (closed)) this mechanism is going to be still working for the existing https and moat distributors. But our new moat circumvention settings (bridgedb#40025 (closed)) will need rdsys to implement this mechanism if we care about it.

It looks like in the real world this protection hasn't stopped big attackers from listing all the bridges, and the effort might not be worth it. So I will say we should just close this issue and forget about distributing bridges by IP.

But I'll like to hear from others with more experience what they think. @cohosh @arma any opinions here?

Edited Nov 10, 2021 by meskio
Assignee
Assign to
Time tracking